HC1062 Decision Making and problem-solving

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester T2 2020
Unit Code HC1062
Unit Title Decision Making and problem-solving
Assessment Type Group Assignment, Group size: 3 to 4 members
Assessment Title Research Report
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) Students are required to identify a management problem for a selected organization. (Excluding a market research problem) and Prepare a persuasive report showing how the management problem/decision should be managed.
Weight 30 % of the total assessments
Total Marks 30 marks – research paper
Word limit At least 2,500 words
Due Date Week 10 – 11:59 pm

HC1062 T2 2020 DECISION MAKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING

My Best Assignment Help

Assignment Specifications

PURPOSE:

In a group of 3 to 4 students, prepare a persuasive report showing how the management problem/decision should be managed. This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with a general framework of at least one management-related topic. Students will be required to apply relevant theoretical concepts with the use of practical examples in most cases in a written research paper.

Details:

Written report – worth 30% of your final grade and must be submitted Week 10 at 11:59 pm.

Identify a multinational company.

Identify a management problem. (Note: not a market research nature). Specify research questions that address the management problem/decision. Design a research program.

Carry out the research.

Sourcing from ONLY secondary data. Analyze the findings.

Identify alternatives and make recommendations to improve the performance of the organization.

Your report is to be written as a business report. It must include;

  • Executive summary
  • Table of contents
  • Section headings
  • Paragraphing
  • Page numbers
  • The reference list at the end of the report

HC1062 Decision making and problem solving

My Best Assignment Help

Marking Rubric – Written Report

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Clear evidence of Clear evidence of a summary that summarises the entire report (3 marks) Some evidence of a summary that summarises the entire report (2marks) Limited No executive
Executive a summary which evidence of a summary
Summary summaries the summary of the included (0 marks)
(4 marks) the entire report (4 the entire report ( 1
marks) mark)
Discussion on Demonstration of Demonstration of Demonstration of Demonstration of Demonstration of
allocated Outstanding very good good knowledge of satisfactory little or no
general knowledge of the knowledge of the the chosen topic and knowledge of the knowledge of
framework chosen topic and chosen topic and has included minimal chosen topic and the chosen topic and
(8 marks) has included has included some research beyond has included no discussion has little
significant research research          beyond areas covered within research beyond or no relevance to
which are beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. (6 areas covered the topic chosen (<4
areas covered within the lecture notes. (7 marks) within the lecture marks)
the lecture notes. (8 marks) notes. (4 marks)
marks)
Application of theory on Individual component discussion (8 marks) Your interpretation of the theory is accurate and insightful and has included significant research which goes beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified. (8 marks) Your interpretation of the theory is accurate and has some insight and included some research that goes beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified. (7 marks) Your interpretation of theory somewhat accurate and has included minimal research which is beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified (6mrks) interpretation of the theory is very general and has included no research which is beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified. (4 marks) Your interpretation of the theory is missing or not relevant to the topic. No identification of the author had been given (<4 marks)
Overall Report is Report is well Report is somewhat The report is structured with some clarity, and uses some paragraphs and subheadings. (3 marks) Poorly presented.
presentation exceptionally structured with structured             with Report is not
and quality of structured with clarity, use of clarity,         use         of structured with
report (6 clarity, use of paragraphs and paragraphs             and any clarity, and
marks) paragraphs and subheadings. subheadings. (4mrks) does not use of
subheadings. (6 (5mrks) paragraphs and
marks) subheadings.
(<3marks)

HC1062 Decision making and problem-solving

Referencing (4 marks) Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least 6 relevant references were used from good sources. All intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (4marks) Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least 5 relevant references were used from good sources. All intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (3 marks) Clear systematic referencing using Harvard style for all sources. At least 4 relevant references were used from good sources. Most intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (2 marks) The limited attempt at formatting references. References largely unrelated to the topic area. At least 3 references were provided. Most intext referencing done correctly and relevant. (1mark) Poorly presented, no apparent structure. No use of Harvard referencing style. References were unrelated to the topic area. Only 0 r 1 relevant reference given (<1 marks)

Visit At :- HC1041 IT FOR BUSINESS TUTORIAL ANSWERS

https://mybestassignmenthelp.com/hc1041-it-for-business-tutorial-answers/