MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER
Read the posted article called “Business Leadership: Three Levels of Ethical Analysis” and write a paper discussing your understanding of the model presented and how it relates to leadership.
Use the Gibbs’ Cycle to discuss concepts in the article and relate them to how you personally deal with these types of situations. Provide an example(s) to substantiate and analyze concepts from the Three Levels of Ethical Analysis paper. Discuss how your actions relate to the three levels in the paper.
Write the paper using APA style with between 8 and 10 citations and references, in addition to the textbook, including several peer-reviewed references. All sources MUST HAVE authors, publication dates, and publishers. “Anonymous” authors and sources without dates or publishers will not be accepted as valid sources and marks will be deducted.
MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER
The paper should be at least 1750 words (8-9 pages), and should exhibit good writing and analytical skills – review the marking rubric. It holds a value of 10% of your final mark.
| Written Communication Assessment 10% | |||
| 1-2 Did not meet expectations | 3-4 Met expectations | 5 Exceeded expectations | |
| Writing Conventions (grammar, word use, punctuation, mechanics) | Frequent grammatical errors and misspellings inhibit readability Informal language, abbreviations, and slang are used | Few grammatical errors (3 or fewer per page) Correct verb tense used Paragraphs flow from one to another Active voice pervasive | Free of grammatical errors and misspellings Effective verb tense used; Uses phrases and construction that delight as well as inform the reader Primarily active voice |
| Overall Effectiveness appearance/format | Not formatted to Specifications, Lacking professional appearance | Formatting is generally correct, acceptable professional appearance. | The assigned format followed explicitly: Exceptional professional appearance |
MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER
| Critical Thinking and Written Analyses Rubric 90% | |||
| Criteria | 1-5 Did Not Meet Expectations | 6-8 Met Expectations | 9-10 Exceeded Expectations |
| Clarity | Writing is not clear. It is difficult to understand the points being made. The writing lacks transitions, and few examples and/or illustrations are provided to support explanations or recommendations. | Writing is generally well organized and understood. Transitions are used to facilitate clarity. Some examples and/illustrations are used to support explanations or recommendations. | Writing is succinct, precise, effectively organized with no ambiguity. Transitions, explanations, and elaboration are extensive to elucidate points. Detailed illustrations and/or examples are used to support explanation & recommendations |
| Relevance | Critical issues/questions are omitted or ignored in the writing. | Most of the critical issues/questions are addressed in the writing.
MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER |
All critical issues/questions are addressed completely in writing
MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER |
| Depth of Discussion /20 | Ignores bias; Omits arguments Misrepresents issues; Excludes data; Includes but does not detect inconsistency of information; Ideas contain unnecessary gaps, repetition or extraneous details overlooks differences | Detects bias; Recognizes arguments; Categorizes content; Paraphrases data; Sufficient detail to support conclusions and/or recommendations
MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER |
The analysis includes insightful questions; Refutes bias; Discusses issues thoroughly; Critiques content; Values information Examines inconsistencies; Offers extensive detail to support conclusions and recommendations; Suggests solutions/ implementation
MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER |
| The breadth of Discussion /20 | Omits arguments or perspectives; Misses major content areas/concepts; Presents few options | Covers the breadth of the topic without being superfluous | Considers multiple perspectives; Thoroughly delves into the issues/questions; Thoroughly discusses relevant facts |
| Integration Elements of Reasoning /20 | Fails to draw conclusions or conclusions rely on author’s authority rather than the strength of presentation; Draws faulty conclusions; Shows intellectual dishonesty | Formulates clear conclusions with adequate support | Assimilates and critically reviews information, uses reasonable judgment and provides balanced, well-justified conclusions |
| Internally Consistent | There is little integration across the sections of the paper. Several inconsistencies or contradictions exist. Few of the issues, recommendations, and explanations make sense; not well integrated. | Sections of the paper are generally well-linked/connected. Only minor contradictions exist. Most of the issues, recommendations, and explanations make sense and are well integrated. | All sections of the paper are linked. There are no contradictions in the writing. All issues, recommendations, and explanations make sense and are well integrated
MGMT 601 ASSIGNMENT 2 ETHICAL ANALYSIS PAPER |
Visit At: – MIS782 VALUED OF INFORMATION DEAKIN
